Fleet Rankings

Which US nuclear operator runs the best fleet? Composite of 7 publicly observable performance metrics, aggregated by owner. Data refreshed 1.1h ago

20
Operators Ranked
93 active units total
70
Top Fleet
Constellation Energy · 21 units
19
Bottom Fleet
DTE Energy · 1 units
Compare any 4 units
Side-by-Side Tool
Fleet size: All 20 Mega-fleet (8+) Mid (3–7) Small (1–2) Showing 20 of 20 operators

Operator Fleet Excellence Leaderboard Click any row to expand the unit-level breakdown

# Operator Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Units Top Q Bottom Q Best Worst
1 Constellation Energy Top Quartile 70 77 71 63 21 71% 0% Peach Bottom 3 88 Clinton 43

Constellation Energy — 21 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Peach Bottom 3 PA 88 96 77 91 Top Quartile #2 / 93
Byron 2 IL 88 83 95 86 Top Quartile #3 / 93
Braidwood 2 IL 87 79 95 88 Top Quartile #4 / 93
Limerick 2 PA 81 84 89 70 Top Quartile #5 / 93
LaSalle 2 IL 79 68 90 78 Top Quartile #6 / 93
Byron 1 IL 78 72 90 73 Top Quartile #7 / 93
Calvert Cliffs 1 MD 78 72 77 86 Top Quartile #8 / 93
Braidwood 1 IL 75 78 89 57 Top Quartile #11 / 93
Quad Cities 1 IL 74 78 69 74 Top Quartile #13 / 93
Dresden 2 IL 73 89 77 53 Top Quartile #14 / 93
Limerick 1 PA 73 81 70 67 Top Quartile #15 / 93
Dresden 3 IL 72 70 65 80 Top Quartile #16 / 93
FitzPatrick NY 71 92 64 56 Top Quartile #19 / 93
LaSalle 1 IL 70 79 70 63 Top Quartile #20 / 93
Ginna NY 69 70 90 47 Top Quartile #23 / 93
Peach Bottom 2 PA 64 85 66 41 Mid Quartile #26 / 93
Nine Mile Point 1 NY 61 87 26 70 Mid Quartile #28 / 93
Calvert Cliffs 2 MD 54 73 46 42 Mid Quartile #36 / 93
Nine Mile Point 2 NY 51 64 54 35 Mid Quartile #41 / 93
Quad Cities 2 IL 49 57 55 35 Mid Quartile #50 / 93
Clinton IL 43 60 46 22 Mid Quartile #59 / 93
2 Duke Energy Top Quartile 65 63 66 65 11 45% 0% Oconee 1 90 Robinson 2 49

Duke Energy — 11 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Oconee 1 SC 90 89 87 95 Top Quartile #1 / 93
Oconee 3 SC 78 71 68 94 Top Quartile #9 / 93
Catawba 1 SC 74 57 77 88 Top Quartile #12 / 93
McGuire 1 NC 71 67 64 81 Top Quartile #18 / 93
Harris 1 NC 65 64 78 52 Top Quartile #24 / 93
Oconee 2 SC 64 69 62 61 Mid Quartile #25 / 93
Brunswick 2 NC 61 78 58 47 Mid Quartile #27 / 93
McGuire 2 NC 55 47 65 52 Mid Quartile #32 / 93
Catawba 2 SC 53 37 69 53 Mid Quartile #37 / 93
Brunswick 1 NC 51 61 51 41 Mid Quartile #44 / 93
Robinson 2 SC 49 52 47 49 Mid Quartile #49 / 93
3 NextEra Energy Top Quartile 53 48 57 52 7 29% 14% Point Beach 1 75 Turkey Point 3 33

NextEra Energy — 7 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Point Beach 1 WI 75 71 88 66 Top Quartile #10 / 93
Point Beach 2 WI 72 66 85 64 Top Quartile #17 / 93
Seabrook 1 NH 52 48 51 56 Mid Quartile #39 / 93
Turkey Point 4 FL 50 50 54 46 Mid Quartile #47 / 93
Saint Lucie 1 FL 47 44 51 46 Mid Quartile #52 / 93
Saint Lucie 2 FL 39 29 17 72 Mid Quartile #64 / 93
Turkey Point 3 FL 33 29 54 17 Bottom Quartile #77 / 93
4 Arizona Public Service Top Quartile 49 42 49 55 3 0% 33% Palo Verde 1 59 Palo Verde 2 34

Arizona Public Service — 3 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Palo Verde 1 AZ 59 54 54 69 Mid Quartile #30 / 93
Palo Verde 3 AZ 52 44 55 57 Mid Quartile #38 / 93
Palo Verde 2 AZ 34 26 37 40 Bottom Quartile #71 / 93
5 Vistra Corp. Top Quartile 48 48 50 46 6 17% 17% Davis-Besse 70 Perry 1 21

Vistra Corp. — 6 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Davis-Besse OH 70 54 62 93 Top Quartile #21 / 93
Comanche Peak 1 TX 54 55 55 51 Mid Quartile #35 / 93
Beaver Valley 2 PA 51 55 67 32 Mid Quartile #40 / 93
Comanche Peak 2 TX 51 55 60 38 Mid Quartile #46 / 93
Beaver Valley 1 PA 42 41 51 34 Mid Quartile #60 / 93
Perry 1 OH 21 28 7 28 Bottom Quartile #87 / 93
6 PSEG Nuclear Mid Quartile 47 46 43 54 3 0% 33% Salem 1 61 Hope Creek 1 31

PSEG Nuclear — 3 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Salem 1 NJ 61 59 48 75 Mid Quartile #29 / 93
Salem 2 NJ 51 53 53 47 Mid Quartile #42 / 93
Hope Creek 1 NJ 31 27 27 38 Bottom Quartile #81 / 93
7 STP Nuclear Operating Mid Quartile 47 41 52 49 2 0% 0% South Texas 2 51 South Texas 1 43

STP Nuclear Operating — 2 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
South Texas 2 TX 51 40 63 50 Mid Quartile #45 / 93
South Texas 1 TX 43 41 41 47 Mid Quartile #58 / 93
8 Pacific Gas & Electric Mid Quartile 44 50 34 49 2 0% 0% Diablo Canyon 1 47 Diablo Canyon 2 42

Pacific Gas & Electric — 2 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Diablo Canyon 1 CA 47 58 36 46 Mid Quartile #53 / 93
Diablo Canyon 2 CA 42 41 32 53 Mid Quartile #61 / 93
9 Nebraska Public Power District Mid Quartile 44 75 24 32 1 0% 0% Cooper 44 Cooper 44

Nebraska Public Power District — 1 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Cooper NE 44 75 24 32 Mid Quartile #57 / 93
10 Dominion Energy Mid Quartile 43 29 38 62 7 0% 29% Surry 2 59 Summer 18

Dominion Energy — 7 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Surry 2 VA 59 39 49 88 Mid Quartile #31 / 93
Millstone 2 CT 51 24 57 72 Mid Quartile #43 / 93
Surry 1 VA 50 40 48 61 Mid Quartile #48 / 93
North Anna 1 VA 46 36 62 40 Mid Quartile #54 / 93
North Anna 2 VA 45 28 28 79 Mid Quartile #56 / 93
Millstone 3 CT 34 25 10 66 Bottom Quartile #72 / 93
Summer SC 18 10 15 31 Bottom Quartile #89 / 93
11 Wolf Creek Nuclear Mid Quartile 42 34 29 63 1 0% 0% Wolf Creek 1 42 Wolf Creek 1 42

Wolf Creek Nuclear — 1 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Wolf Creek 1 KS 42 34 29 63 Mid Quartile #62 / 93
12 Southern Nuclear Mid Quartile 39 41 45 31 7 14% 43% Vogtle 2 70 Vogtle 3 6

Southern Nuclear — 7 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Vogtle 2 GA 70 65 63 81 Top Quartile #22 / 93
Vogtle 1 GA 54 48 64 50 Mid Quartile #34 / 93
Farley 1 AL 49 49 67 31 Mid Quartile #51 / 93
Farley 2 AL 39 48 45 23 Mid Quartile #65 / 93
Hatch 2 GA 33 44 37 19 Bottom Quartile #76 / 93
Hatch 1 GA 23 30 27 12 Bottom Quartile #86 / 93
Vogtle 3 GA 6 3 12 1 Bottom Quartile #93 / 93
13 Energy Northwest Mid Quartile 36 51 20 36 1 0% 0% Columbia Generating Station 36 Columbia Generating Station 36

Energy Northwest — 1 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Columbia Generating Station WA 36 51 20 36 Mid Quartile #70 / 93
14 Talen Energy Mid Quartile 35 54 33 19 2 0% 50% Susquehanna 2 41 Susquehanna 1 30

Talen Energy — 2 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Susquehanna 2 PA 41 63 30 28 Mid Quartile #63 / 93
Susquehanna 1 PA 30 45 35 9 Bottom Quartile #82 / 93
15 Indiana Michigan Power Mid Quartile 35 38 36 31 2 0% 50% D.C. Cook 1 36 D.C. Cook 2 34

Indiana Michigan Power — 2 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
D.C. Cook 1 MI 36 40 29 38 Mid Quartile #69 / 93
D.C. Cook 2 MI 34 35 42 24 Bottom Quartile #73 / 93
16 Tennessee Valley Authority Bottom Quartile 34 32 35 35 7 0% 57% Browns Ferry 2 46 Watts Bar 1 24

Tennessee Valley Authority — 7 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Browns Ferry 2 AL 46 66 42 29 Mid Quartile #55 / 93
Browns Ferry 1 AL 38 43 41 32 Mid Quartile #66 / 93
Watts Bar 2 TN 37 23 65 24 Mid Quartile #68 / 93
Browns Ferry 3 AL 33 35 26 38 Bottom Quartile #74 / 93
Sequoyah 2 TN 31 20 29 44 Bottom Quartile #80 / 93
Sequoyah 1 TN 28 21 20 42 Bottom Quartile #83 / 93
Watts Bar 1 TN 24 15 23 35 Bottom Quartile #85 / 93
17 Xcel Energy Bottom Quartile 32 35 31 29 3 0% 67% Prairie Island 1 38 Monticello 25

Xcel Energy — 3 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Prairie Island 1 MN 38 31 38 45 Mid Quartile #67 / 93
Prairie Island 2 MN 32 41 31 24 Bottom Quartile #78 / 93
Monticello MN 25 32 25 19 Bottom Quartile #84 / 93
18 Ameren Missouri Bottom Quartile 31 14 21 58 1 0% 100% Callaway 31 Callaway 31

Ameren Missouri — 1 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Callaway MO 31 14 21 58 Bottom Quartile #79 / 93
19 Entergy Bottom Quartile 25 29 18 29 5 0% 80% Arkansas Nuclear 2 54 Waterford 3 10

Entergy — 5 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Arkansas Nuclear 2 AR 54 44 42 77 Mid Quartile #33 / 93
Arkansas Nuclear 1 AR 33 27 29 44 Bottom Quartile #75 / 93
River Bend 1 LA 16 31 7 8 Bottom Quartile #90 / 93
Grand Gulf 1 MS 14 28 11 2 Bottom Quartile #91 / 93
Waterford 3 LA 10 17 1 13 Bottom Quartile #92 / 93
20 DTE Energy Bottom Quartile 19 35 12 11 1 0% 100% Fermi 2 19 Fermi 2 19

DTE Energy — 1 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Fermi 2 MI 19 35 12 11 Bottom Quartile #88 / 93
Want to compare specific units head-to-head? Open the unit comparison tool →

How fleet rankings are computed

NukeWorker's Operational Excellence Score ranks every active US nuclear unit on a 0–100 composite of seven publicly observable performance metrics. This page rolls those unit scores up to the operator level so you can see which company runs the best fleet.

Aggregation: Each operator's fleet score is the simple unweighted average of its scored units' composites and sub-scores. We use unweighted averaging (rather than MWe-weighted) because this is meant to reward consistency across the fleet — a single weak performer drags an operator down regardless of nameplate, which is what an "operator excellence" metric should measure.

  • Composite — average of the unit composites in the fleet.
  • Top Q / Bottom Q — share of the operator's units that fall in the top and bottom INPO-style quartiles of the full fleet.
  • Best / Worst — the operator's highest- and lowest-scoring individual units.
  • Provisional units (e.g. Vogtle 4) and decommissioned units are excluded from the operator's average.

Fleet-size buckets: mega-fleet (8+ units), mid (3–7), small (1–2). Use the pills above to compare like-sized operators.

Refreshes daily. See the unit-level Operator Efficiency Leaderboard →