Beaver Valley 1 - Status & History

Comprehensive reactor performance metrics, cycle analysis, and historical outage data.

?
Composite Operational Excellence Score (0-100) — average percentile rank across 7 dimensions in three sub-scores: Reliability (capacity factor, forced outage days, B2B avg streak), Efficiency (fuel utilization, refuel duration), and Discipline (startup duration, scram count). 5-year window. Higher = more operationally excellent. Click to see the full breakdown.
43
Excellence
#60 of 94
Mid Quartile
?
Days of continuous operation since the last outage ended. Clean run (no forced outages since last refueling).
175
Current Run
days ✔
?
Longest recorded period of continuous operation between outages (2007-10-24 to 2009-04-20).
544
Record Run
days
?
Breaker-to-Breaker runs — continuous operation exceeding the cycle-adjusted threshold (451 days for this 18-month cycle unit) with no trips to 0% power.
9
B2B Runs
?
Lifetime capacity factor: average power level across all recorded days (100% = always at full power).
90.7%
Capacity Factor
?
Total number of scheduled refueling outages detected in the historical data.
18
Outages
since 1999
?
Average time from first power generation (>0%) to sustained full power (≥95% for 2+ days) across the last 3 scheduled outages. Click to compare against the fleet on the Operator Efficiency Leaderboard.
6
Avg Startup
days (last 3)
?
Average fuel utilization — percent of the designed fuel cycle that this unit consumes before refueling, derived from the historical burn-down trajectory. Higher = more efficient operator (refuels with less margin remaining; closer to coastdown). Computed as 100% minus the unit's average refuel-point fuel %, using the last 3 years where available, otherwise lifetime average. Click to compare against the fleet on the Operator Efficiency Leaderboard.
99.2%
Fuel Utilization
3yr avg
?
NukeWorker's Operational Excellence Score is a composite 0–100 ranking of every active US nuclear unit across 7 publicly observable performance metrics, grouped into three sub-scores:
Reliability — capacity factor, forced outage days, B2B avg streak
Efficiency — fuel utilization, refuel duration
Discipline — startup duration, scram count
Each unit's metric is converted to a percentile across the active fleet. Sub-score = average of its components; composite = average of the three sub-scores. Use the time-window toggle below to switch between 3yr / 5yr / lifetime.
Time window — change how far back we look
NukeWorker's
Operational
Excellence Score
43/100
Mid Quartile · #60/94
5-year window

Beaver Valley 1 ranks #60 of 94 active US units on NukeWorker's Operational Excellence Score over the 5-year window. Strongest area: Fuel Utilization (80th percentile). Weakest: Refuel Duration (20th percentile).

Reliability
45
Capacity factor + Forced outages + B2B streaks
Efficiency
50
Fuel utilization + Refuel duration
Discipline
34
Startup duration + Scram count
Cohort Rankings apples-to-apples comparison within each peer group
Reactor type: #42 of 61 PWR
Containment: #35 of 48 Dry Ambient (PWR)
Cycle length: #35 of 54 18-month cycle
Fleet rank above (60 of 94) compares all active US units; cohort ranks compare only against units sharing this property.
Per-dimension breakdown (7 metrics)
Capacity Factor 53th
91.6% (higher better, Reliability)
Forced Outage Days/yr 55th
3.2d (lower better, Reliability)
B2B Avg Streak 27th
504d (higher better, Reliability)
Fuel Utilization 80th
98.7% (higher better, Efficiency)
Refuel Duration 20th
39d (lower better, Efficiency)
Startup Duration 39th
5.0d (lower better, Discipline)
Scrams (5-year) 30th
0.6/yr (lower better, Discipline)

Each dimension's percentile is computed across the active US fleet (94 units with sufficient history). Sub-score = average of its component percentiles. Composite = average of the three sub-scores. 5-year window. View full leaderboard →

Methodology

NukeWorker's Operational Excellence Score is a composite ranking that combines 7 publicly observable performance metrics into a single 0-100 number per US nuclear unit.

How it's computed: Each unit's raw value is converted to a percentile (0-100) within the 94 active US units that have at least 2 completed refueling cycles. The 7 percentiles are averaged into 3 sub-scores (Reliability, Efficiency, Discipline), and those are averaged into the final composite.

Active window — 5-year:

  • Reliability — Capacity factor (5yr), forced outage days/yr (5yr), B2B avg streak (lifetime)
  • Efficiency — in-cycle fuel utilization (3yr), median refuel duration (5yr)
  • Discipline — robust mean startup duration, scrams/yr (5yr, annualised)

Cohort rankings: alongside the fleet rank, each unit gets ranked within its reactor type (PWR/BWR), containment design (Ice Condenser, Mark I, etc.), and cycle length (12/18/24-month). Useful for apples-to-apples comparisons.

What's excluded: subjective community ratings, confidential INPO ratings, financial metrics. We only use publicly available NRC + cycle data.

Why three windows? 5yr (default) is the industry standard. 3yr captures recent operational changes and post-pandemic recovery. Lifetime gives newer units a fair comparison and reveals long-term consistency.

Edge cases: units with fewer than 2 cycles (e.g., Vogtle 4) show "Provisional". Decommissioned units excluded.

Refresh cadence: recomputed daily. Each window cached separately.

A data-derived proxy for operational performance; not affiliated with INPO. INPO ratings are confidential and qualitative — ours is public and quantitative.

5-yr trend: 2021: 60/100 (#34/93)2022: 50/100 (#50/92)2023: 49/100 (#46/92)2024: 32/100 (#75/93)2025: 31/100 (#75/94)2026: 32/100 (#74/94) Stable vs 2025
Compare Beaver Valley 1 head-to-head with up to 3 other units. Compare now
?
Duration of each outage in days, shown chronologically. Green bars are scheduled refueling outages, red bars are forced/unscheduled. The orange dashed line marks the average duration. Extended outages (>180 days) and D&D periods are excluded.

Outage Duration Trend

?
Days between consecutive scheduled refueling outage starts, showing operating cycle regularity. The purple dashed line marks the average cycle length. Most U.S. reactors operate on 18-month (547 day) or 24-month (730 day) cycles.

Cycle Length History

?
Time in days from first power generation (>0%) to sustained full power (≥95% for 2+ consecutive days) after each scheduled refueling outage. The dashed line marks the average. Includes startup testing holds and power dips.

Startup Duration Trend

?
Estimated fuel remaining in the current cycle, expressed as a percentage of the unit's typical cycle. Starts at 100% when the unit returns to power post-refuel and drops as full-power-days are burned. Days at reduced power burn fuel proportionally — so a unit with significant downtime (high burn deficit) drops slower and ends up with MORE fuel left than its calendar position would suggest. Coastdown threshold around 15%. Toggle to overlay past cycles on a normalized "days into cycle" axis to see how aggressively this unit historically burns down before refuel.

Fuel Burn Down Cycle since Nov 21, 2025

66.2% remaining 173 / 508 days 1.0 FPD margin
Avg refuel: 2.3% Avg refuel (3yr): 0.8% Deepest burn: 0.0% (2003-04 → 2004-10) Most margin: 11.5% (2004-11 → 2006-02)
?
Monthly capacity factor with outage events overlaid as red bands. Green bars show average power level per month. Toggle to Daily view for raw daily data.

Power History

Scheduled
2025-10-12 2025-11-20 40 509d 2025-10-08 +4d
Scheduled
2024-04-13 2024-05-21 39 512d 2024-04-13 0d
Scheduled
2022-10-09 2022-11-18 41 101d 2022-10-09 0d
Unscheduled
2022-06-24 2022-06-30 7 3d - -
Scram # 55943
2022-06-16 2022-06-21 6 402d - -
Scheduled
2021-04-11 2021-05-10 30 523d 2021-04-04 +7d
Scheduled
2019-10-13 2019-11-05 24 522d 2019-10-13 0d
Scheduled
2018-04-15 2018-05-09 25 155d 2018-04-14 +1d
Scram # 53056
2017-11-08 2017-11-11 4 380d - -
Unscheduled Startup Hold
2016-10-23 2016-10-24 2 2d - -
Scheduled
2016-09-24 2016-10-21 28 468d 2016-09-30 -6d
Unscheduled
2015-06-13 2015-06-14 2 21d - -
Scheduled
2015-04-25 2015-05-23 29 9d 2015-04-06 +19d
Scram # 50985
2015-04-16 2015-04-16 1 443d - -
Scram # 49697
2014-01-07 2014-01-28 22 60d - -
Scram # 49505
2013-11-06 2013-11-08 3 3d - -
Scheduled
2013-09-30 2013-11-03 35 508d 2013-09-30 0d
Scheduled
2012-04-09 2012-05-10 32 360d 2012-04-07 +2d
Unscheduled
2011-04-14 2011-04-15 2 162d - -
Scheduled
2010-10-02 2010-11-03 33 499d 2010-10-04 -2d
Scheduled
2009-04-20 2009-05-21 32 544d 2009-04-20 0d
Scheduled
2007-09-24 2007-10-24 31 380d 2007-09-24 0d
Unscheduled
2006-09-08 2006-09-09 2 10d - -
Unscheduled
2006-08-26 2006-08-29 4 91d - -
Unscheduled
2006-05-27 2006-05-27 1 38d - -
Scheduled SGR/Major
2006-02-13 2006-04-19 66 456d 2006-02-12 +1d
Scheduled
2004-10-18 2004-11-14 28 339d 2004-10-17 +1d
Unscheduled
2003-11-14 2003-11-14 1 199d - -
Scheduled
2003-03-08 2003-04-29 53 10d 2003-03-08 0d
Unscheduled
2003-02-25 2003-02-26 2 95d - -
Unscheduled
2002-11-12 2002-11-22 11 338d - -
Unscheduled
2001-12-08 2001-12-09 2 29d - -
Unscheduled
2001-11-07 2001-11-09 3 30d - -
Scheduled
2001-09-01 2001-10-08 38 69d 2001-09-01 0d
Unscheduled
2001-06-23 2001-06-24 2 56d - -
Unscheduled
2001-04-20 2001-04-28 9 288d - -
Unscheduled
2000-07-06 2000-07-06 1 79d - -
Unscheduled
2000-04-18 2000-04-18 1 11d - -
Scheduled
2000-02-16 2000-04-07 52 159d 2000-02-16 0d
Unscheduled
1999-09-10 1999-09-10 1 2d - -
Unscheduled
1999-09-07 1999-09-08 2 124d - -
Unscheduled
1999-05-02 1999-05-06 5 2d - -
Unscheduled
1999-04-13 1999-04-30 18 47d - -
Unscheduled
1999-02-15 1999-02-25 11 21d - -
Unscheduled
1999-01-24 1999-01-25 2 - - -
Page created in 0.088 seconds with 7 queries.