Brunswick 2 - Status & History

Comprehensive reactor performance metrics, cycle analysis, and historical outage data.

?
Composite Operational Excellence Score (0-100) — average percentile rank across 7 dimensions in three sub-scores: Reliability (capacity factor, forced outage days, B2B avg streak), Efficiency (fuel utilization, refuel duration), and Discipline (startup duration, scram count). 5-year window. Higher = more operationally excellent. Click to see the full breakdown.
62
Excellence
#29 of 94
Mid Quartile
?
Days of continuous operation since the last outage ended. Clean run (no forced outages since last refueling).
412
Current Run
days ✔
?
Longest recorded period of continuous operation between outages (2023-03-06 to 2025-03-01).
726
Record Run
days
?
Breaker-to-Breaker runs — continuous operation exceeding the cycle-adjusted threshold (621 days for this 24-month cycle unit) with no trips to 0% power.
3
B2B Runs
?
Lifetime capacity factor: average power level across all recorded days (100% = always at full power).
90.6%
Capacity Factor
?
Total number of scheduled refueling outages detected in the historical data.
14
Outages
since 1999
?
Average time from first power generation (>0%) to sustained full power (≥95% for 2+ days) across the last 3 scheduled outages. Click to compare against the fleet on the Operator Efficiency Leaderboard.
6.7
Avg Startup
days (last 3)
?
Average fuel utilization — percent of the designed fuel cycle that this unit consumes before refueling, derived from the historical burn-down trajectory. Higher = more efficient operator (refuels with less margin remaining; closer to coastdown). Computed as 100% minus the unit's average refuel-point fuel %, using the last 3 years where available, otherwise lifetime average. Click to compare against the fleet on the Operator Efficiency Leaderboard.
100.0%
Fuel Utilization
3yr avg
?
NukeWorker's Operational Excellence Score is a composite 0–100 ranking of every active US nuclear unit across 7 publicly observable performance metrics, grouped into three sub-scores:
Reliability — capacity factor, forced outage days, B2B avg streak
Efficiency — fuel utilization, refuel duration
Discipline — startup duration, scram count
Each unit's metric is converted to a percentile across the active fleet. Sub-score = average of its components; composite = average of the three sub-scores. Use the time-window toggle below to switch between 3yr / 5yr / lifetime.
Time window — change how far back we look
NukeWorker's
Operational
Excellence Score
62/100
Mid Quartile · #29/94
5-year window

Brunswick 2 ranks #29 of 94 active US units on NukeWorker's Operational Excellence Score over the 5-year window. Strongest area: Scrams (5-year) (90th percentile). Weakest: Startup Duration (6th percentile).

Reliability
80
Capacity factor + Forced outages + B2B streaks
Efficiency
58
Fuel utilization + Refuel duration
Discipline
48
Startup duration + Scram count
Cohort Rankings apples-to-apples comparison within each peer group
Reactor type: #11 of 31 BWR
Containment: #7 of 19 Mark I (BWR)
Cycle length: #16 of 40 24-month cycle
Fleet rank above (29 of 94) compares all active US units; cohort ranks compare only against units sharing this property.
Per-dimension breakdown (7 metrics)
Capacity Factor 76th
94.2% (higher better, Reliability)
Forced Outage Days/yr 78th
1.6d (lower better, Reliability)
B2B Avg Streak 84th
698d (higher better, Reliability)
Fuel Utilization 46th
97.9% (higher better, Efficiency)
Refuel Duration 69th
27d (lower better, Efficiency)
Startup Duration 6th
9.5d (lower better, Discipline)
Scrams (5-year) 90th
0.0/yr (lower better, Discipline)

Each dimension's percentile is computed across the active US fleet (94 units with sufficient history). Sub-score = average of its component percentiles. Composite = average of the three sub-scores. 5-year window. View full leaderboard →

Methodology

NukeWorker's Operational Excellence Score is a composite ranking that combines 7 publicly observable performance metrics into a single 0-100 number per US nuclear unit.

How it's computed: Each unit's raw value is converted to a percentile (0-100) within the 94 active US units that have at least 2 completed refueling cycles. The 7 percentiles are averaged into 3 sub-scores (Reliability, Efficiency, Discipline), and those are averaged into the final composite.

Active window — 5-year:

  • Reliability — Capacity factor (5yr), forced outage days/yr (5yr), B2B avg streak (lifetime)
  • Efficiency — in-cycle fuel utilization (3yr), median refuel duration (5yr)
  • Discipline — robust mean startup duration, scrams/yr (5yr, annualised)

Cohort rankings: alongside the fleet rank, each unit gets ranked within its reactor type (PWR/BWR), containment design (Ice Condenser, Mark I, etc.), and cycle length (12/18/24-month). Useful for apples-to-apples comparisons.

What's excluded: subjective community ratings, confidential INPO ratings, financial metrics. We only use publicly available NRC + cycle data.

Why three windows? 5yr (default) is the industry standard. 3yr captures recent operational changes and post-pandemic recovery. Lifetime gives newer units a fair comparison and reveals long-term consistency.

Edge cases: units with fewer than 2 cycles (e.g., Vogtle 4) show "Provisional". Decommissioned units excluded.

Refresh cadence: recomputed daily. Each window cached separately.

A data-derived proxy for operational performance; not affiliated with INPO. INPO ratings are confidential and qualitative — ours is public and quantitative.

5-yr trend: 2021: 64/100 (#28/93)2022: 61/100 (#29/92)2023: 66/100 (#23/92)2024: 74/100 (#15/93)2025: 78/100 (#13/94)2026: 80/100 (#10/94) Stable vs 2025
Compare Brunswick 2 head-to-head with up to 3 other units. Compare now
?
Duration of each outage in days, shown chronologically. Green bars are scheduled refueling outages, red bars are forced/unscheduled. The orange dashed line marks the average duration. Extended outages (>180 days) and D&D periods are excluded.

Outage Duration Trend

?
Days between consecutive scheduled refueling outage starts, showing operating cycle regularity. The purple dashed line marks the average cycle length. Most U.S. reactors operate on 18-month (547 day) or 24-month (730 day) cycles.

Cycle Length History

?
Time in days from first power generation (>0%) to sustained full power (≥95% for 2+ consecutive days) after each scheduled refueling outage. The dashed line marks the average. Includes startup testing holds and power dips.

Startup Duration Trend

?
Estimated fuel remaining in the current cycle, expressed as a percentage of the unit's typical cycle. Starts at 100% when the unit returns to power post-refuel and drops as full-power-days are burned. Days at reduced power burn fuel proportionally — so a unit with significant downtime (high burn deficit) drops slower and ends up with MORE fuel left than its calendar position would suggest. Coastdown threshold around 15%. Toggle to overlay past cycles on a normalized "days into cycle" axis to see how aggressively this unit historically burns down before refuel.

Fuel Burn Down Cycle since Mar 30, 2025

41.2% remaining 409 / 692 days 1.8 FPD margin
Avg refuel: 5.4% Avg refuel (3yr): 0.0% Deepest burn: 0.0% (2001-03 → 2003-03) Most margin: 11.8% (1999-05 → 2001-02)
?
Monthly capacity factor with outage events overlaid as red bands. Green bars show average power level per month. Toggle to Daily view for raw daily data.

Power History

Scheduled
2025-03-01 2025-03-28 28 726d 2025-03-01 0d
Scheduled
2023-02-08 2023-03-06 27 370d 2023-04-01 -52d
Unscheduled
2022-01-29 2022-02-03 6 300d - -
Scheduled
2021-03-06 2021-04-04 30 546d 2021-02-27 +7d
Unscheduled
2019-09-06 2019-09-07 2 148d - -
Scram # 53966
2019-03-31 2019-04-11 12 2d - -
Scheduled
2019-03-02 2019-03-29 28 164d 2019-03-02 0d
Unscheduled
2018-09-14 2018-09-19 6 80d - -
Unscheduled
2018-06-24 2018-06-26 3 437d - -
Scheduled
2017-03-18 2017-04-13 27 714d 2017-03-18 0d
Scheduled
2015-02-21 2015-04-04 43 657d 2015-02-14 +7d
Scheduled SGR/Major
2013-03-03 2013-05-05 64 459d 2013-03-03 0d
Scram # 47444
2011-11-16 2011-11-30 15 2d - -
Unscheduled
2011-11-05 2011-11-14 10 199d - -
Unscheduled
2011-04-19 2011-04-20 2 6d - -
Scheduled
2011-03-05 2011-04-13 40 392d 2011-03-05 0d
Unscheduled
2010-02-04 2010-02-06 3 128d - -
Unscheduled
2009-09-21 2009-09-29 9 147d - -
Unscheduled
2009-04-23 2009-04-27 5 3d - -
Scheduled
2009-02-28 2009-04-20 52 105d 2009-02-28 0d
Unscheduled
2008-11-10 2008-11-15 6 69d - -
Unscheduled
2008-08-31 2008-09-02 3 503d - -
Scheduled
2007-03-03 2007-04-16 45 64d 2007-03-02 +1d
Unscheduled
2006-12-26 2006-12-29 4 39d - -
Unscheduled
2006-11-02 2006-11-17 16 158d - -
Unscheduled
2006-05-20 2006-05-28 9 282d - -
Unscheduled
2005-08-07 2005-08-11 5 118d - -
Unscheduled
2005-04-09 2005-04-11 3 4d - -
Scheduled
2005-03-05 2005-04-05 32 216d 2005-03-04 +1d
Unscheduled
2004-07-30 2004-08-01 3 60d - -
Unscheduled
2004-05-29 2004-05-31 3 204d - -
Unscheduled
2003-11-05 2003-11-07 3 214d - -
Unscheduled Startup Hold
2003-04-05 2003-04-05 1 3d - -
Scheduled
2003-03-08 2003-04-02 26 317d 2003-03-08 0d
Unscheduled
2002-04-20 2002-04-25 6 390d - -
Scheduled
2001-02-24 2001-03-26 31 150d 2001-02-24 0d
Unscheduled
2000-09-22 2000-09-27 6 368d - -
Unscheduled
1999-09-16 1999-09-20 5 16d - -
Unscheduled
1999-08-30 1999-08-31 2 62d - -
Unscheduled
1999-06-29 1999-06-29 1 39d - -
Scheduled
1999-04-17 1999-05-21 35 18d 1999-04-17 0d
Unscheduled
1999-03-30 1999-03-30 1 - - -
Page created in 0.118 seconds with 7 queries.