Palo Verde 3 - Status & History

Comprehensive reactor performance metrics, cycle analysis, and historical outage data.

?
Composite Operational Excellence Score (0-100) — average percentile rank across 7 dimensions in three sub-scores: Reliability (capacity factor, forced outage days, B2B avg streak), Efficiency (fuel utilization, refuel duration), and Discipline (startup duration, scram count). 5-year window. Higher = more operationally excellent. Click to see the full breakdown.
52
Excellence
#40 of 94
Mid Quartile
?
Days of continuous operation since the last outage ended. Clean run (no forced outages since last refueling).
163
Current Run
days ✔
?
Longest recorded period of continuous operation between outages (2022-11-09 to 2024-04-06).
514
Record Run
days
?
Breaker-to-Breaker runs — continuous operation exceeding the cycle-adjusted threshold (433 days for this 18-month cycle unit) with no trips to 0% power.
6
B2B Runs
?
Lifetime capacity factor: average power level across all recorded days (100% = always at full power).
89%
Capacity Factor
?
Total number of scheduled refueling outages detected in the historical data.
18
Outages
since 2000
?
Average time from first power generation (>0%) to sustained full power (≥95% for 2+ days) across the last 3 scheduled outages. Click to compare against the fleet on the Operator Efficiency Leaderboard.
5.3
Avg Startup
days (last 3)
?
Average fuel utilization — percent of the designed fuel cycle that this unit consumes before refueling, derived from the historical burn-down trajectory. Higher = more efficient operator (refuels with less margin remaining; closer to coastdown). Computed as 100% minus the unit's average refuel-point fuel %, using the last 3 years where available, otherwise lifetime average. Click to compare against the fleet on the Operator Efficiency Leaderboard.
99.6%
Fuel Utilization
3yr avg
?
NukeWorker's Operational Excellence Score is a composite 0–100 ranking of every active US nuclear unit across 7 publicly observable performance metrics, grouped into three sub-scores:
Reliability — capacity factor, forced outage days, B2B avg streak
Efficiency — fuel utilization, refuel duration
Discipline — startup duration, scram count
Each unit's metric is converted to a percentile across the active fleet. Sub-score = average of its components; composite = average of the three sub-scores. Use the time-window toggle below to switch between 3yr / 5yr / lifetime.
Time window — change how far back we look
NukeWorker's
Operational
Excellence Score
52/100
Mid Quartile · #40/94
5-year window

Palo Verde 3 ranks #40 of 94 active US units on NukeWorker's Operational Excellence Score over the 5-year window. Strongest area: Fuel Utilization (80th percentile). Weakest: B2B Avg Streak (8th percentile).

Reliability
42
Capacity factor + Forced outages + B2B streaks
Efficiency
54
Fuel utilization + Refuel duration
Discipline
58
Startup duration + Scram count
Cohort Rankings apples-to-apples comparison within each peer group
Reactor type: #28 of 61 PWR
Containment: #23 of 48 Dry Ambient (PWR)
Cycle length: #22 of 54 18-month cycle
Fleet rank above (40 of 94) compares all active US units; cohort ranks compare only against units sharing this property.
Per-dimension breakdown (7 metrics)
Capacity Factor 51th
91.1% (higher better, Reliability)
Forced Outage Days/yr 68th
2.2d (lower better, Reliability)
B2B Avg Streak 8th
490d (higher better, Reliability)
Fuel Utilization 80th
98.7% (higher better, Efficiency)
Refuel Duration 29th
36d (lower better, Efficiency)
Startup Duration 46th
4.7d (lower better, Discipline)
Scrams (5-year) 70th
0.2/yr (lower better, Discipline)

Each dimension's percentile is computed across the active US fleet (94 units with sufficient history). Sub-score = average of its component percentiles. Composite = average of the three sub-scores. 5-year window. View full leaderboard →

Methodology

NukeWorker's Operational Excellence Score is a composite ranking that combines 7 publicly observable performance metrics into a single 0-100 number per US nuclear unit.

How it's computed: Each unit's raw value is converted to a percentile (0-100) within the 94 active US units that have at least 2 completed refueling cycles. The 7 percentiles are averaged into 3 sub-scores (Reliability, Efficiency, Discipline), and those are averaged into the final composite.

Active window — 5-year:

  • Reliability — Capacity factor (5yr), forced outage days/yr (5yr), B2B avg streak (lifetime)
  • Efficiency — in-cycle fuel utilization (3yr), median refuel duration (5yr)
  • Discipline — robust mean startup duration, scrams/yr (5yr, annualised)

Cohort rankings: alongside the fleet rank, each unit gets ranked within its reactor type (PWR/BWR), containment design (Ice Condenser, Mark I, etc.), and cycle length (12/18/24-month). Useful for apples-to-apples comparisons.

What's excluded: subjective community ratings, confidential INPO ratings, financial metrics. We only use publicly available NRC + cycle data.

Why three windows? 5yr (default) is the industry standard. 3yr captures recent operational changes and post-pandemic recovery. Lifetime gives newer units a fair comparison and reveals long-term consistency.

Edge cases: units with fewer than 2 cycles (e.g., Vogtle 4) show "Provisional". Decommissioned units excluded.

Refresh cadence: recomputed daily. Each window cached separately.

A data-derived proxy for operational performance; not affiliated with INPO. INPO ratings are confidential and qualitative — ours is public and quantitative.

5-yr trend: 2021: 34/100 (#71/93)2022: 35/100 (#68/92)2023: 46/100 (#51/92)2024: 43/100 (#59/93)2025: 46/100 (#54/94)2026: 46/100 (#54/94) Stable vs 2025
Compare Palo Verde 3 head-to-head with up to 3 other units. Compare now
?
Duration of each outage in days, shown chronologically. Green bars are scheduled refueling outages, red bars are forced/unscheduled. The orange dashed line marks the average duration. Extended outages (>180 days) and D&D periods are excluded.

Outage Duration Trend

?
Days between consecutive scheduled refueling outage starts, showing operating cycle regularity. The purple dashed line marks the average cycle length. Most U.S. reactors operate on 18-month (547 day) or 24-month (730 day) cycles.

Cycle Length History

?
Time in days from first power generation (>0%) to sustained full power (≥95% for 2+ consecutive days) after each scheduled refueling outage. The dashed line marks the average. Includes startup testing holds and power dips.

Startup Duration Trend

?
Estimated fuel remaining in the current cycle, expressed as a percentage of the unit's typical cycle. Starts at 100% when the unit returns to power post-refuel and drops as full-power-days are burned. Days at reduced power burn fuel proportionally — so a unit with significant downtime (high burn deficit) drops slower and ends up with MORE fuel left than its calendar position would suggest. Coastdown threshold around 15%. Toggle to overlay past cycles on a normalized "days into cycle" axis to see how aggressively this unit historically burns down before refuel.

Fuel Burn Down Cycle since Dec 4, 2025

68.8% remaining 160 / 508 days 1.3 FPD margin
Avg refuel: 4.5% Avg refuel (3yr): 0.4% Deepest burn: 0.0% (2012-04 → 2013-10) Most margin: 18.2% (2004-12 → 2006-04)
?
Monthly capacity factor with outage events overlaid as red bands. Green bars show average power level per month. Toggle to Daily view for raw daily data.

Power History

Scheduled
2025-10-04 2025-12-02 60 510d 2025-09-25 +9d
Scheduled
2024-04-06 2024-05-12 37 514d 2024-04-05 +1d
Scheduled
2022-10-08 2022-11-09 33 303d 2022-10-08 0d
Scram # 55626
2021-12-07 2021-12-09 3 204d - -
Scheduled
2021-04-10 2021-05-17 38 419d 2021-04-10 0d
Unscheduled
2020-02-09 2020-02-16 8 81d - -
Scheduled
2019-10-05 2019-11-20 47 462d 2019-09-29 +6d
Scram # 53477
2018-06-28 2018-06-30 3 55d - -
Scheduled
2018-04-07 2018-05-04 28 328d 2018-04-07 0d
Unscheduled
2017-05-10 2017-05-14 5 187d - -
Scheduled
2016-10-08 2016-11-04 28 16d 2016-10-07 +1d
Unscheduled
2016-09-20 2016-09-22 3 506d - -
Scheduled
2015-04-04 2015-05-03 30 495d 2015-04-04 0d
Scheduled
2013-10-05 2013-11-25 52 339d 2013-10-05 0d
Unscheduled
2012-10-25 2012-10-31 7 191d - -
Scheduled
2012-03-17 2012-04-17 32 421d 2012-03-17 0d
Scram # 46556
2011-01-20 2011-01-21 2 72d - -
Scheduled
2010-10-02 2010-11-09 39 301d 2010-10-02 0d
Unscheduled
2009-12-04 2009-12-05 2 191d - -
Scheduled
2009-04-04 2009-05-27 54 187d 2009-04-04 0d
Unscheduled
2008-09-28 2008-09-29 2 9d - -
Unscheduled
2008-09-17 2008-09-19 3 246d - -
Scheduled SGR/Major
2007-09-29 2008-01-15 109 151d 2007-09-29 0d
Unscheduled
2007-04-13 2007-05-01 19 72d - -
Unscheduled
2007-01-27 2007-01-31 5 99d - -
Unscheduled
2006-10-19 2006-10-20 2 108d - -
Unscheduled
2006-07-02 2006-07-03 2 51d - -
Scheduled
2006-04-01 2006-05-12 42 26d 2006-03-31 +1d
Unscheduled
2006-03-06 2006-03-06 1 137d - -
Unscheduled
2005-10-12 2005-10-20 9 6d - -
Unscheduled
2005-10-02 2005-10-06 5 82d - -
Unscheduled
2005-07-06 2005-07-12 7 13d - -
Unscheduled
2005-05-23 2005-06-23 32 168d - -
Scheduled
2004-10-02 2004-12-06 66 105d 2004-10-02 0d
Unscheduled
2004-06-15 2004-06-19 5 6d - -
Unscheduled
2004-06-08 2004-06-09 2 93d - -
Unscheduled
2004-02-29 2004-03-07 8 209d - -
Unscheduled
2003-07-29 2003-08-04 7 39d - -
Unscheduled
2003-06-19 2003-06-20 2 50d - -
Scheduled
2003-03-29 2003-04-30 33 510d 2003-03-29 0d
Scheduled
2001-09-29 2001-11-04 37 41d 2001-09-29 0d
Unscheduled
2001-08-18 2001-08-19 2 89d - -
Unscheduled
2001-05-20 2001-05-21 2 81d - -
Unscheduled
2001-02-17 2001-02-28 12 138d - -
Unscheduled
2000-09-28 2000-10-02 5 150d - -
Scheduled
2000-04-01 2000-05-01 31 - 2000-04-01 0d
Page created in 0.092 seconds with 7 queries.