Quad Cities 2 - Status & History

Comprehensive reactor performance metrics, cycle analysis, and historical outage data.

?
Composite Operational Excellence Score (0-100) — average percentile rank across 7 dimensions in three sub-scores: Reliability (capacity factor, forced outage days, B2B avg streak), Efficiency (fuel utilization, refuel duration), and Discipline (startup duration, scram count). 5-year window. Higher = more operationally excellent. Click to see the full breakdown.
50
Excellence
#46 of 94 ↑18
Mid Quartile
?
Days of continuous operation since the last outage ended. Clean run (no forced outages since last refueling).
--
Current Run
?
Longest recorded period of continuous operation between outages (2018-04-07 to 2020-03-30).
723
Record Run
days
?
Breaker-to-Breaker runs — continuous operation exceeding the cycle-adjusted threshold (626 days for this 24-month cycle unit) with no trips to 0% power.
4
B2B Runs
?
Lifetime capacity factor: average power level across all recorded days (100% = always at full power).
92%
Capacity Factor
?
Total number of scheduled refueling outages detected in the historical data.
14
Outages
since 1999
?
Average time from first power generation (>0%) to sustained full power (≥95% for 2+ days) across the last 3 scheduled outages. Click to compare against the fleet on the Operator Efficiency Leaderboard.
3
Avg Startup
days (last 3)
?
Average fuel utilization — percent of the designed fuel cycle that this unit consumes before refueling, derived from the historical burn-down trajectory. Higher = more efficient operator (refuels with less margin remaining; closer to coastdown). Computed as 100% minus the unit's average refuel-point fuel %, using the last 3 years where available, otherwise lifetime average. Click to compare against the fleet on the Operator Efficiency Leaderboard.
100.0%
Fuel Utilization
3yr avg
?
NukeWorker's Operational Excellence Score is a composite 0–100 ranking of every active US nuclear unit across 7 publicly observable performance metrics, grouped into three sub-scores:
Reliability — capacity factor, forced outage days, B2B avg streak
Efficiency — fuel utilization, refuel duration
Discipline — startup duration, scram count
Each unit's metric is converted to a percentile across the active fleet. Sub-score = average of its components; composite = average of the three sub-scores. Use the time-window toggle below to switch between 3yr / 5yr / lifetime.
Time window — change how far back we look
NukeWorker's
Operational
Excellence Score
50/100
Mid Quartile · #46/94
5-year window

Quad Cities 2 ranks #46 of 94 active US units on NukeWorker's Operational Excellence Score over the 5-year window. Strongest area: B2B Avg Streak (83th percentile). Weakest: Scrams (5-year) (16th percentile).

Reliability
59
Capacity factor + Forced outages + B2B streaks
Efficiency
55
Fuel utilization + Refuel duration
Discipline
36
Startup duration + Scram count
Cohort Rankings apples-to-apples comparison within each peer group
Reactor type: #14 of 31 BWR
Containment: #9 of 19 Mark I (BWR)
Cycle length: #20 of 40 24-month cycle
Fleet rank above (46 of 94) compares all active US units; cohort ranks compare only against units sharing this property.
Per-dimension breakdown (7 metrics)
Capacity Factor 50th
91.0% (higher better, Reliability)
Forced Outage Days/yr 44th
4.6d (lower better, Reliability)
B2B Avg Streak 83th
696d (higher better, Reliability)
Fuel Utilization 31th
97.2% (higher better, Efficiency)
Refuel Duration 79th
24d (lower better, Efficiency)
Startup Duration 56th
4.1d (lower better, Discipline)
Scrams (5-year) 16th
0.8/yr (lower better, Discipline)

Each dimension's percentile is computed across the active US fleet (94 units with sufficient history). Sub-score = average of its component percentiles. Composite = average of the three sub-scores. 5-year window. View full leaderboard →

Methodology

NukeWorker's Operational Excellence Score is a composite ranking that combines 7 publicly observable performance metrics into a single 0-100 number per US nuclear unit.

How it's computed: Each unit's raw value is converted to a percentile (0-100) within the 94 active US units that have at least 2 completed refueling cycles. The 7 percentiles are averaged into 3 sub-scores (Reliability, Efficiency, Discipline), and those are averaged into the final composite.

Active window — 5-year:

  • Reliability — Capacity factor (5yr), forced outage days/yr (5yr), B2B avg streak (lifetime)
  • Efficiency — in-cycle fuel utilization (3yr), median refuel duration (5yr)
  • Discipline — robust mean startup duration, scrams/yr (5yr, annualised)

Cohort rankings: alongside the fleet rank, each unit gets ranked within its reactor type (PWR/BWR), containment design (Ice Condenser, Mark I, etc.), and cycle length (12/18/24-month). Useful for apples-to-apples comparisons.

What's excluded: subjective community ratings, confidential INPO ratings, financial metrics. We only use publicly available NRC + cycle data.

Why three windows? 5yr (default) is the industry standard. 3yr captures recent operational changes and post-pandemic recovery. Lifetime gives newer units a fair comparison and reveals long-term consistency.

Edge cases: units with fewer than 2 cycles (e.g., Vogtle 4) show "Provisional". Decommissioned units excluded.

Refresh cadence: recomputed daily. Each window cached separately.

A data-derived proxy for operational performance; not affiliated with INPO. INPO ratings are confidential and qualitative — ours is public and quantitative.

5-yr trend: 2021: 88/100 (#2/93)2022: 72/100 (#18/92)2023: 45/100 (#53/92)2024: 57/100 (#29/93)2025: 45/100 (#56/94)2026: 52/100 (#38/94) ↑ +6.9 pts vs 2025
Compare Quad Cities 2 head-to-head with up to 3 other units. Compare now
?
Duration of each outage in days, shown chronologically. Green bars are scheduled refueling outages, red bars are forced/unscheduled. The orange dashed line marks the average duration. Extended outages (>180 days) and D&D periods are excluded.

Outage Duration Trend

?
Days between consecutive scheduled refueling outage starts, showing operating cycle regularity. The purple dashed line marks the average cycle length. Most U.S. reactors operate on 18-month (547 day) or 24-month (730 day) cycles.

Cycle Length History

?
Time in days from first power generation (>0%) to sustained full power (≥95% for 2+ consecutive days) after each scheduled refueling outage. The dashed line marks the average. Includes startup testing holds and power dips.

Startup Duration Trend

?
Estimated fuel remaining in the current cycle, expressed as a percentage of the unit's typical cycle. Starts at 100% when the unit returns to power post-refuel and drops as full-power-days are burned. Days at reduced power burn fuel proportionally — so a unit with significant downtime (high burn deficit) drops slower and ends up with MORE fuel left than its calendar position would suggest. Coastdown threshold around 15%. Toggle to overlay past cycles on a normalized "days into cycle" axis to see how aggressively this unit historically burns down before refuel.

Fuel Burn Down Cycle since Apr 25, 2026

98.3% remaining 18 / 703 days 5.8 FPD margin
Avg refuel: 3.7% Avg refuel (3yr): 0.0% Deepest burn: 0.0% (2018-04 → 2020-03) Most margin: 11.5% (2004-03 → 2006-03)
?
Monthly capacity factor with outage events overlaid as red bands. Green bars show average power level per month. Toggle to Daily view for raw daily data.

Power History

Unscheduled
2026-05-09 In Outage 5+ 16d - -
Scheduled
2026-03-30 2026-04-23 25 674d 2026-03-30 0d
Scram # 57141
2024-05-24 2024-05-25 2 44d - -
Scheduled
2024-03-18 2024-04-10 24 218d 2024-03-17 +1d
Scram # 56676
2023-08-12 2023-08-13 2 88d - -
Unscheduled
2023-05-10 2023-05-16 7 185d - -
Scram # 56210
2022-11-05 2022-11-06 2 123d - -
Scram # 55975
2022-07-04 2022-07-05 2 72d - -
Scheduled
2022-03-21 2022-04-23 34 707d 2022-03-21 0d
Scheduled
2020-03-30 2020-04-13 15 723d 2020-03-30 0d
Scheduled
2018-03-19 2018-04-07 20 220d 2018-03-19 0d
Unscheduled
2017-08-06 2017-08-11 6 486d - -
Scheduled
2016-03-21 2016-04-07 18 685d 2016-03-21 0d
Scheduled
2014-04-01 2014-05-06 36 429d 2014-04-07 -6d
Unscheduled
2013-01-27 2013-01-27 1 282d - -
Scram # 47847
2012-04-19 2012-04-20 2 3d - -
Scheduled
2012-03-19 2012-04-16 29 577d 2012-03-19 0d
Unscheduled
2010-08-18 2010-08-20 3 122d - -
Unscheduled
2010-04-16 2010-04-18 3 2d - -
Scheduled
2010-03-15 2010-04-14 31 450d 2010-03-15 0d
Unscheduled
2008-12-13 2008-12-20 8 6d - -
Unscheduled
2008-12-06 2008-12-07 2 252d - -
Scheduled
2008-03-03 2008-03-29 27 368d 2008-03-03 0d
Unscheduled
2007-02-28 2007-03-01 2 316d - -
Scheduled
2006-03-25 2006-04-18 25 66d 2006-03-24 +1d
Unscheduled
2006-01-14 2006-01-18 5 13d - -
Unscheduled
2005-12-31 2006-01-01 2 229d - -
Unscheduled
2005-05-09 2005-05-16 8 408d - -
Scheduled
2004-02-24 2004-03-27 33 241d 2004-02-24 0d
Unscheduled
2003-06-11 2003-06-28 18 32d - -
Unscheduled
2003-05-09 2003-05-10 2 19d - -
Unscheduled
2003-04-17 2003-04-20 4 270d - -
Unscheduled
2002-07-12 2002-07-21 10 97d - -
Unscheduled
2002-04-06 2002-04-06 1 5d - -
Unscheduled
2002-03-30 2002-04-01 3 26d - -
Scheduled
2002-02-12 2002-03-04 21 170d 2002-02-12 0d
Unscheduled
2001-08-03 2001-08-26 24 138d - -
Unscheduled
2001-03-17 2001-03-18 2 241d - -
Unscheduled
2000-07-19 2000-07-19 1 56d - -
Unscheduled
2000-05-23 2000-05-24 2 17d - -
Unscheduled
2000-05-06 2000-05-06 1 86d - -
Scheduled
2000-01-22 2000-02-10 20 328d 2000-01-22 0d
Unscheduled
1999-02-20 1999-02-28 9 - - -
Page created in 0.102 seconds with 7 queries.