Sequoyah 1 - Status & History

Comprehensive reactor performance metrics, cycle analysis, and historical outage data.

?
Composite Operational Excellence Score (0-100) — average percentile rank across 7 dimensions in three sub-scores: Reliability (capacity factor, forced outage days, B2B avg streak), Efficiency (fuel utilization, refuel duration), and Discipline (startup duration, scram count). 5-year window. Higher = more operationally excellent. Click to see the full breakdown.
26
Excellence
#84 of 94
Bottom Quartile
?
Days of continuous operation since the last outage ended. Clean run (no forced outages since last refueling).
164
Current Run
days ✔
?
Longest recorded period of continuous operation between outages (2012-03-30 to 2013-10-14).
563
Record Run
days
?
Breaker-to-Breaker runs — continuous operation exceeding the cycle-adjusted threshold (434 days for this 18-month cycle unit) with no trips to 0% power.
6
B2B Runs
?
Lifetime capacity factor: average power level across all recorded days (100% = always at full power).
89.4%
Capacity Factor
?
Total number of scheduled refueling outages detected in the historical data.
18
Outages
since 2000
?
Average time from first power generation (>0%) to sustained full power (≥95% for 2+ days) across the last 3 scheduled outages. Click to compare against the fleet on the Operator Efficiency Leaderboard.
4.3
Avg Startup
days (last 3)
?
Average fuel utilization — percent of the designed fuel cycle that this unit consumes before refueling, derived from the historical burn-down trajectory. Higher = more efficient operator (refuels with less margin remaining; closer to coastdown). Computed as 100% minus the unit's average refuel-point fuel %, using the last 3 years where available, otherwise lifetime average. Click to compare against the fleet on the Operator Efficiency Leaderboard.
92.7%
Fuel Utilization
3yr avg
?
NukeWorker's Operational Excellence Score is a composite 0–100 ranking of every active US nuclear unit across 7 publicly observable performance metrics, grouped into three sub-scores:
Reliability — capacity factor, forced outage days, B2B avg streak
Efficiency — fuel utilization, refuel duration
Discipline — startup duration, scram count
Each unit's metric is converted to a percentile across the active fleet. Sub-score = average of its components; composite = average of the three sub-scores. Use the time-window toggle below to switch between 3yr / 5yr / lifetime.
Time window — change how far back we look
NukeWorker's
Operational
Excellence Score
26/100
Bottom Quartile · #84/94
5-year window

Sequoyah 1 ranks #84 of 94 active US units on NukeWorker's Operational Excellence Score over the 5-year window. Strongest area: Startup Duration (56th percentile). Weakest: B2B Avg Streak (13th percentile).

Reliability
24
Capacity factor + Forced outages + B2B streaks
Efficiency
19
Fuel utilization + Refuel duration
Discipline
36
Startup duration + Scram count
Cohort Rankings apples-to-apples comparison within each peer group
Reactor type: #58 of 61 PWR
Containment: #9 of 10 Ice Condenser
Cycle length: #50 of 54 18-month cycle
Fleet rank above (84 of 94) compares all active US units; cohort ranks compare only against units sharing this property.
Per-dimension breakdown (7 metrics)
Capacity Factor 36th
89.4% (higher better, Reliability)
Forced Outage Days/yr 21th
8.4d (lower better, Reliability)
B2B Avg Streak 13th
497d (higher better, Reliability)
Fuel Utilization 16th
95.7% (higher better, Efficiency)
Refuel Duration 23th
38d (lower better, Efficiency)
Startup Duration 56th
4.1d (lower better, Discipline)
Scrams (5-year) 16th
0.8/yr (lower better, Discipline)

Each dimension's percentile is computed across the active US fleet (94 units with sufficient history). Sub-score = average of its component percentiles. Composite = average of the three sub-scores. 5-year window. View full leaderboard →

Methodology

NukeWorker's Operational Excellence Score is a composite ranking that combines 7 publicly observable performance metrics into a single 0-100 number per US nuclear unit.

How it's computed: Each unit's raw value is converted to a percentile (0-100) within the 94 active US units that have at least 2 completed refueling cycles. The 7 percentiles are averaged into 3 sub-scores (Reliability, Efficiency, Discipline), and those are averaged into the final composite.

Active window — 5-year:

  • Reliability — Capacity factor (5yr), forced outage days/yr (5yr), B2B avg streak (lifetime)
  • Efficiency — in-cycle fuel utilization (3yr), median refuel duration (5yr)
  • Discipline — robust mean startup duration, scrams/yr (5yr, annualised)

Cohort rankings: alongside the fleet rank, each unit gets ranked within its reactor type (PWR/BWR), containment design (Ice Condenser, Mark I, etc.), and cycle length (12/18/24-month). Useful for apples-to-apples comparisons.

What's excluded: subjective community ratings, confidential INPO ratings, financial metrics. We only use publicly available NRC + cycle data.

Why three windows? 5yr (default) is the industry standard. 3yr captures recent operational changes and post-pandemic recovery. Lifetime gives newer units a fair comparison and reveals long-term consistency.

Edge cases: units with fewer than 2 cycles (e.g., Vogtle 4) show "Provisional". Decommissioned units excluded.

Refresh cadence: recomputed daily. Each window cached separately.

A data-derived proxy for operational performance; not affiliated with INPO. INPO ratings are confidential and qualitative — ours is public and quantitative.

5-yr trend: 2021: 33/100 (#73/93)2022: 28/100 (#74/92)2023: 30/100 (#77/92)2024: 27/100 (#82/93)2025: 19/100 (#88/94)2026: 20/100 (#88/94) Stable vs 2025
Compare Sequoyah 1 head-to-head with up to 3 other units. Compare now
?
Duration of each outage in days, shown chronologically. Green bars are scheduled refueling outages, red bars are forced/unscheduled. The orange dashed line marks the average duration. Extended outages (>180 days) and D&D periods are excluded.

Outage Duration Trend

?
Days between consecutive scheduled refueling outage starts, showing operating cycle regularity. The purple dashed line marks the average cycle length. Most U.S. reactors operate on 18-month (547 day) or 24-month (730 day) cycles.

Cycle Length History

?
Time in days from first power generation (>0%) to sustained full power (≥95% for 2+ consecutive days) after each scheduled refueling outage. The dashed line marks the average. Includes startup testing holds and power dips.

Startup Duration Trend

?
Estimated fuel remaining in the current cycle, expressed as a percentage of the unit's typical cycle. Starts at 100% when the unit returns to power post-refuel and drops as full-power-days are burned. Days at reduced power burn fuel proportionally — so a unit with significant downtime (high burn deficit) drops slower and ends up with MORE fuel left than its calendar position would suggest. Coastdown threshold around 15%. Toggle to overlay past cycles on a normalized "days into cycle" axis to see how aggressively this unit historically burns down before refuel.

Fuel Burn Down Cycle since Dec 4, 2025

70.3% remaining 160 / 520 days 5.7 FPD margin
Avg refuel: 6.0% Avg refuel (3yr): 7.3% Deepest burn: 0.0% (2000-03 → 2001-10) Most margin: 16.2% (2017-01 → 2018-04)
?
Monthly capacity factor with outage events overlaid as red bands. Green bars show average power level per month. Toggle to Daily view for raw daily data.

Power History

Scheduled
2025-10-04 2025-12-01 59 100d 2025-10-03 +1d
Scram # 57778
2025-06-24 2025-06-26 3 248d - -
Scram # 57351
2024-09-30 2024-10-19 20 30d - -
Scram # 57285
2024-08-24 2024-08-31 8 116d - -
Scheduled
2024-03-23 2024-04-30 39 486d 2024-03-29 -6d
Scheduled
2022-10-22 2022-11-23 33 440d 2022-10-22 0d
Unscheduled
2021-08-06 2021-08-08 3 69d - -
Scram # 55272
2021-05-25 2021-05-29 5 15d - -
Scheduled
2021-04-10 2021-05-10 31 331d 2021-04-10 0d
Scram # 54708
2020-05-13 2020-05-14 2 169d - -
Scheduled
2019-10-12 2019-11-26 46 45d 2019-09-29 +13d
Scram # 54242
2019-08-27 2019-08-28 2 133d - -
Scram # 53999
2019-04-14 2019-04-16 3 122d - -
Unscheduled
2018-12-10 2018-12-13 4 218d - -
Scheduled
2018-04-07 2018-05-06 30 180d 2018-04-07 0d
Unscheduled
2017-10-02 2017-10-09 8 275d - -
Scheduled
2016-11-26 2016-12-31 36 286d 2016-11-05 +21d
Unscheduled
2015-12-27 2016-02-14 50 33d - -
Scram # 51559
2015-11-24 2015-11-24 1 66d - -
Scram # 51392
2015-09-14 2015-09-19 6 31d - -
Unscheduled
2015-08-09 2015-08-14 6 9d - -
Unscheduled
2015-07-31 2015-07-31 1 2d - -
Scram # 51265
2015-07-28 2015-07-29 2 2d - -
Scram # 51265
2015-07-25 2015-07-26 2 71d - -
Scheduled
2015-04-11 2015-05-15 35 28d 2015-04-13 -2d
Scram # 50878
2015-03-12 2015-03-14 3 477d - -
Scheduled
2013-10-14 2013-11-20 38 563d 2013-10-14 0d
Scheduled
2012-02-27 2012-03-30 33 191d 2012-02-27 0d
Scram # 47169
2011-08-19 2011-08-20 2 29d - -
Scram # 47081
2011-07-21 2011-07-21 1 24d - -
Scram # 46991
2011-06-27 2011-06-27 1 186d - -
Unscheduled
2010-12-20 2010-12-23 4 33d - -
Unscheduled
2010-11-17 2010-11-17 1 2d - -
Scheduled
2010-10-02 2010-11-15 45 512d 2010-10-01 +1d
Unscheduled
2009-05-07 2009-05-08 2 7d - -
Unscheduled
2009-04-29 2009-04-30 2 2d - -
Scheduled
2009-03-27 2009-04-27 32 434d 2009-03-29 -2d
Unscheduled
2008-01-17 2008-01-18 2 63d - -
Scheduled
2007-10-04 2007-11-15 43 508d 2007-09-30 +4d
Scheduled
2006-04-10 2006-05-14 35 364d 2006-04-09 +1d
Unscheduled
2005-04-10 2005-04-11 2 142d - -
Scheduled
2004-10-25 2004-11-19 26 220d 2004-10-25 0d
Unscheduled
2004-03-15 2004-03-19 5 197d - -
Unscheduled
2003-08-29 2003-08-31 3 76d - -
Scheduled SGR/Major
2003-03-17 2003-06-14 90 481d 2003-03-17 0d
Scheduled
2001-10-22 2001-11-21 31 343d 2001-10-22 0d
Unscheduled
2000-10-07 2000-11-13 38 2d - -
Unscheduled
2000-09-26 2000-10-05 10 189d - -
Unscheduled Startup Hold
2000-03-21 2000-03-21 1 4d - -
Scheduled
2000-02-23 2000-03-17 24 - 2000-02-23 0d
Page created in 0.142 seconds with 7 queries.