South Texas 1 - Status & History

Comprehensive reactor performance metrics, cycle analysis, and historical outage data.

?
Composite Operational Excellence Score (0-100) — average percentile rank across 7 dimensions in three sub-scores: Reliability (capacity factor, forced outage days, B2B avg streak), Efficiency (fuel utilization, refuel duration), and Discipline (startup duration, scram count). 5-year window. Higher = more operationally excellent. Click to see the full breakdown.
42
Excellence
#63 of 94 ↑8
Mid Quartile
?
Days of continuous operation since the last outage ended. Clean run (no forced outages since last refueling).
22
Current Run
days ✔
?
Longest recorded period of continuous operation between outages (2005-04-14 to 2006-10-01).
535
Record Run
days
?
Breaker-to-Breaker runs — continuous operation exceeding the cycle-adjusted threshold (448 days for this 18-month cycle unit) with no trips to 0% power.
9
B2B Runs
?
Lifetime capacity factor: average power level across all recorded days (100% = always at full power).
89.7%
Capacity Factor
?
Total number of scheduled refueling outages detected in the historical data.
18
Outages
since 1999
?
Average time from first power generation (>0%) to sustained full power (≥95% for 2+ days) across the last 3 scheduled outages. Click to compare against the fleet on the Operator Efficiency Leaderboard.
5.3
Avg Startup
days (last 3)
?
Average fuel utilization — percent of the designed fuel cycle that this unit consumes before refueling, derived from the historical burn-down trajectory. Higher = more efficient operator (refuels with less margin remaining; closer to coastdown). Computed as 100% minus the unit's average refuel-point fuel %, using the last 3 years where available, otherwise lifetime average. Click to compare against the fleet on the Operator Efficiency Leaderboard.
99.7%
Fuel Utilization
3yr avg
?
NukeWorker's Operational Excellence Score is a composite 0–100 ranking of every active US nuclear unit across 7 publicly observable performance metrics, grouped into three sub-scores:
Reliability — capacity factor, forced outage days, B2B avg streak
Efficiency — fuel utilization, refuel duration
Discipline — startup duration, scram count
Each unit's metric is converted to a percentile across the active fleet. Sub-score = average of its components; composite = average of the three sub-scores. Use the time-window toggle below to switch between 3yr / 5yr / lifetime.
Time window — change how far back we look
NukeWorker's
Operational
Excellence Score
42/100
Mid Quartile · #63/94
5-year window

South Texas 1 ranks #63 of 94 active US units on NukeWorker's Operational Excellence Score over the 5-year window. Strongest area: Scrams (5-year) (70th percentile). Weakest: Startup Duration (26th percentile).

Reliability
39
Capacity factor + Forced outages + B2B streaks
Efficiency
41
Fuel utilization + Refuel duration
Discipline
48
Startup duration + Scram count
Cohort Rankings apples-to-apples comparison within each peer group
Reactor type: #44 of 61 PWR
Containment: #37 of 48 Dry Ambient (PWR)
Cycle length: #37 of 54 18-month cycle
Fleet rank above (63 of 94) compares all active US units; cohort ranks compare only against units sharing this property.
Per-dimension breakdown (7 metrics)
Capacity Factor 35th
89.3% (higher better, Reliability)
Forced Outage Days/yr 35th
5.4d (lower better, Reliability)
B2B Avg Streak 46th
513d (higher better, Reliability)
Fuel Utilization 28th
97.0% (higher better, Efficiency)
Refuel Duration 53th
32d (lower better, Efficiency)
Startup Duration 26th
5.8d (lower better, Discipline)
Scrams (5-year) 70th
0.2/yr (lower better, Discipline)

Each dimension's percentile is computed across the active US fleet (94 units with sufficient history). Sub-score = average of its component percentiles. Composite = average of the three sub-scores. 5-year window. View full leaderboard →

Methodology

NukeWorker's Operational Excellence Score is a composite ranking that combines 7 publicly observable performance metrics into a single 0-100 number per US nuclear unit.

How it's computed: Each unit's raw value is converted to a percentile (0-100) within the 94 active US units that have at least 2 completed refueling cycles. The 7 percentiles are averaged into 3 sub-scores (Reliability, Efficiency, Discipline), and those are averaged into the final composite.

Active window — 5-year:

  • Reliability — Capacity factor (5yr), forced outage days/yr (5yr), B2B avg streak (lifetime)
  • Efficiency — in-cycle fuel utilization (3yr), median refuel duration (5yr)
  • Discipline — robust mean startup duration, scrams/yr (5yr, annualised)

Cohort rankings: alongside the fleet rank, each unit gets ranked within its reactor type (PWR/BWR), containment design (Ice Condenser, Mark I, etc.), and cycle length (12/18/24-month). Useful for apples-to-apples comparisons.

What's excluded: subjective community ratings, confidential INPO ratings, financial metrics. We only use publicly available NRC + cycle data.

Why three windows? 5yr (default) is the industry standard. 3yr captures recent operational changes and post-pandemic recovery. Lifetime gives newer units a fair comparison and reveals long-term consistency.

Edge cases: units with fewer than 2 cycles (e.g., Vogtle 4) show "Provisional". Decommissioned units excluded.

Refresh cadence: recomputed daily. Each window cached separately.

A data-derived proxy for operational performance; not affiliated with INPO. INPO ratings are confidential and qualitative — ours is public and quantitative.

5-yr trend: 2021: 54/100 (#46/93)2022: 57/100 (#36/92)2023: 60/100 (#29/92)2024: 44/100 (#56/93)2025: 50/100 (#43/94)2026: 54/100 (#35/94) ↑ +3.3 pts vs 2025
Compare South Texas 1 head-to-head with up to 3 other units. Compare now
?
Duration of each outage in days, shown chronologically. Green bars are scheduled refueling outages, red bars are forced/unscheduled. The orange dashed line marks the average duration. Extended outages (>180 days) and D&D periods are excluded.

Outage Duration Trend

?
Days between consecutive scheduled refueling outage starts, showing operating cycle regularity. The purple dashed line marks the average cycle length. Most U.S. reactors operate on 18-month (547 day) or 24-month (730 day) cycles.

Cycle Length History

?
Time in days from first power generation (>0%) to sustained full power (≥95% for 2+ consecutive days) after each scheduled refueling outage. The dashed line marks the average. Includes startup testing holds and power dips.

Startup Duration Trend

?
Estimated fuel remaining in the current cycle, expressed as a percentage of the unit's typical cycle. Starts at 100% when the unit returns to power post-refuel and drops as full-power-days are burned. Days at reduced power burn fuel proportionally — so a unit with significant downtime (high burn deficit) drops slower and ends up with MORE fuel left than its calendar position would suggest. Coastdown threshold around 15%. Toggle to overlay past cycles on a normalized "days into cycle" axis to see how aggressively this unit historically burns down before refuel.

Fuel Burn Down Cycle since Apr 23, 2026

96.1% remaining 20 / 494 days 0.7 FPD margin
Avg refuel: 1.5% Avg refuel (3yr): 0.3% Deepest burn: 0.0% (2000-05 → 2001-10) Most margin: 11.4% (2015-12 → 2017-03)
?
Monthly capacity factor with outage events overlaid as red bands. Green bars show average power level per month. Toggle to Daily view for raw daily data.

Power History

Scheduled
2026-03-21 2026-04-22 33 498d 2026-03-20 +1d
Scheduled
2024-10-05 2024-11-08 35 66d 2024-10-04 +1d
Scram # 57237
2024-07-25 2024-07-31 7 143d - -
Unscheduled
2024-03-01 2024-03-04 4 31d - -
Unscheduled
2024-01-22 2024-01-30 9 278d - -
Scheduled
2023-03-18 2023-04-19 33 497d 2023-03-17 +1d
Scheduled
2021-10-09 2021-11-06 29 105d 2021-09-11 +28d
Unscheduled
2021-06-24 2021-06-26 3 127d - -
Scram # 55104
2021-02-16 2021-02-17 2 306d - -
Scheduled
2020-03-14 2020-04-16 34 491d 2020-03-13 +1d
Scheduled
2018-10-06 2018-11-09 35 528d 2018-10-06 0d
Scheduled
2017-03-18 2017-04-26 40 317d 2017-03-18 0d
Scram # 51897
2016-05-02 2016-05-05 4 94d - -
Scram # 51687
2016-01-27 2016-01-29 3 34d - -
Scram # 51615
2015-12-22 2015-12-24 3 3d - -
Scheduled
2015-10-18 2015-12-19 63 505d 2015-10-03 +15d
Unscheduled
2014-05-30 2014-05-31 2 5d - -
Scheduled SGR/Major
2014-03-16 2014-05-25 71 152d 2014-03-15 +1d
Unscheduled
2013-10-02 2013-10-15 14 140d - -
Unscheduled
2013-05-12 2013-05-15 4 167d - -
Scheduled
2012-10-21 2012-11-26 37 534d 2012-10-20 +1d
Scheduled
2011-04-03 2011-05-06 34 225d 2011-04-03 0d
Unscheduled
2010-08-21 2010-08-21 1 194d - -
Unscheduled
2010-02-04 2010-02-08 5 78d - -
Scheduled
2009-10-01 2009-11-18 49 524d 2009-10-04 -3d
Scheduled
2008-03-30 2008-04-25 27 513d 2008-03-30 0d
Scheduled
2006-10-01 2006-11-03 34 535d 2006-09-30 +1d
Scheduled
2005-03-09 2005-04-14 37 409d 2005-03-08 +1d
Unscheduled
2004-01-24 2004-01-25 2 170d - -
Scheduled SGR/Major
2003-03-26 2003-08-07 135 24d 2003-03-26 0d
Unscheduled
2003-03-01 2003-03-02 2 97d - -
Unscheduled
2002-11-17 2002-11-24 8 390d - -
Scheduled
2001-10-03 2001-10-23 21 288d 2001-10-03 0d
Unscheduled
2000-12-17 2000-12-19 3 218d - -
Unscheduled
2000-05-13 2000-05-13 1 2d - -
Scheduled SGR/Major
2000-03-01 2000-05-11 72 170d 2000-03-01 0d
Unscheduled
1999-09-12 1999-09-13 2 76d - -
Unscheduled
1999-06-28 1999-06-28 1 43d - -
Unscheduled
1999-05-16 1999-05-16 1 18d - -
Unscheduled
1999-03-27 1999-04-28 33 - - -
Page created in 0.088 seconds with 7 queries.